Tests fail at random
Retries hide instability and engineers stop trusting red builds.
FOR SMALL SAAS ENGINEERING TEAMS
A practical review of your UI/API automation and CI pipeline. Get a clear health score, your highest-risk findings, and a prioritized 30-day plan.
A starting point for better releases
Illustrative score · not a client result
THE PROBLEM
Flaky checks, slow pipelines and unclear test ownership make it harder to know whether a build is ready.
Retries hide instability and engineers stop trusting red builds.
Feedback arrives late, so small changes become slower to validate.
Fixtures, data and helpers are hard to change without breaking other tests.
A USEFUL DIAGNOSIS, NOT A GENERIC AUDIT
One focused review gives your team an outside view and a practical next step, without signing up for an open-ended engagement.
Explore the review →YOUR REVIEWER
Oleksandr Lozytskyi has 10+ years in QA and six years focused on test automation across web products, APIs, CI/CD and newer AI products.
His work includes Playwright, Pytest, Java, Python, Selenide and Cucumber, with pipelines in GitLab CI, Jenkins, Azure DevOps and AWS CodeBuild.
View experience and portfolio ↗fewer pipeline failures
5h → 3hregression runtime reduced
Examples from prior work; not a promised result of this review.A GOOD FIT IF
CLEAR SCOPE. CLEAR PRICE.
Planned introductory price for the first three reviews; final tax treatment is confirmed before any order.
€99 €149
GOOD TO KNOW
A repository or archive, a short product and testing context, and access to one main CI configuration. Never send passwords, tokens or secrets.
The health check is diagnostic. Implementation can be discussed separately after the review.
No. It reviews QA automation practices and CI configuration; it is not a penetration test, security audit or compliance opinion.
Agree a secure transfer method and retention expectations before sharing. Customer code and findings are never published without written permission.